Monthly Tech-Tip | No tracking! No ads! |
The center piece of this 3D printed assembly defines the outside shape of the ceramic vessel (plus two spares at the top). This entire assembly is an all-in-one case mold for a two-piece plaster working mold. This was printed as six light-weight units on standard Prusa MK3 and MK4 printers, walls are 0.8mm thickness. The upper and lower inside model halves were glued together (with the aid of an inside hoop to line them up). Outer flanges were glued on to enable clamping the outer shell vertically and horizontally.
The membranes defining mold mating points are printed onto the inside model, they extend out far enough to clamp between the flanges of the outer shell sections (suspending the model in the center). The membranes have holes to enable inserting natch-pairs. The thin base is glued on to hold the lower outer shells in place (in flexes enough to enable extracting the plaster form without mold breakage). The whole assembly is held together by clamps so it can be used multiple times.
This 3D printed shell encloses an entire two-piece mold for v 5.0 Medalta Potteries ball pitcher - all that is needed is to fill it with plaster and peel off the PLA casing after it sets. We are still in the development stages so the fact that this will only produce one mold is fine. The membrane across the center is where the two mold halves mate (it also holds the inner model in place). The membrane has holes where natch-pairs can be mated for embedding into the plaster mold. The spare (shown lower right) will be rotated 90 degrees, it has a slot that fits snuggly over the membrane to hold it in place. The handle is being done separately. This was printed on a consumer 3D printer with standard PLA filament.
Intimidation by the complexity of this type of software is the biggest obstacle you will face to learning 3D design (for 3D-printing). Here is some motivation: The fact that software of this kind of power and utility is actually available to anyone who wants to try it is amazing. Fusion 360 is from AutoDesk, perhaps it’s leading advantage is the ease of learning and the thousands of videos on Youtube. Its user interface is modern, nothing else matches it. It is fully parametric supporting constraints and a timeline. It can choke on more complex drawings on consumer computers, but we don’t need to do complex drawings.
Fusion 360 is free for personal use, that is suitable while you are learning and developing skill. For commercial use it is $680/yr. But that may be avoidable (see below). Fusion also looks better when compared to alternatives for 3D CAD.
OnShape focusses on collaboration, cloud accessibility. It is free but drawings are public, if you need to go private it’s $1500/yr.
Rhino is usable for CAD but is not fully parametric and does not have a traditional history-based modeling system (however Rhino+Grasshopper is life-changing for geeks who like programming, both for CAD and modelling). $1000 to buy but upgrading is $500+.
Solidworks is fully parametric with editable history. It is low cost for hobby use but for commercial use it is far out of reach for individuals ($2600/yr in 2025).
However, FreeCAD is becoming more viable. It is parametric, has constraints and exports and imports popular formats. Its model tree is equivalent to the Fusion 360 timeline, but more clunky and depends on careful setting of constraints. It seems possible to migrate to it from Fusion through the STEP file format.
Glossary |
0.8mm thickness
This is an ideal wall thickness to print on consumer 3D printer since to normally creates sufficient strength and prints in one two passes |
---|---|
Glossary |
All-in-one case mold
A method of 3D printing the case mold shell of an entire assembled plaster mold for using in ceramic production. |
Buy me a coffee and we can talk