All Glossary

Mineralogy

Raw ceramic materials are minerals or mixtures of minerals. By taking the characteristics of these into account technicians can rationalize the application of glaze chemistry.

Key phrases linking here: solid state, solid-state, mineralogy - Learn more

Details

Ceramic raw materials are mostly studied at the solid state physical level (rather than by the chemistry). The term "mineralogy" implies fundamental different solid states between raw minerals but also expresses the difference between man-made materials (e.g. frits) and natural materials (e.g. feldspars). While most people just see ceramic material powders, technicians look at them under a microscope and see tiny particles that have unique shapes, sizes, mixtures of sizes, surface topologies, electrolytics and population purity or diversity. Many minerals can have diverse populations of particle types while some pure raw minerals have one kind that dominates. Man-made ceramic materials have even better particle uniformity. Mineral particles are most often cyrstalline, having an ordered atomic structure and a specific range of crystalline manifestations. Man-made ceramic materials are most often amorphous.

The properties of raw minerals are a product of their crystal structure (even the tiny particles in the powdered form are crystalline). A given chemistry can exhibit itself in more than one mineral form, each having its own crystalline structure and physical properties. These can be converted one to another by the application of specific heating and cooling curves and exist between specific temperatures (thus certain minerals may only exist inside temperature windows during a firing, you will never be able to hold them in your hand). The most common mineral is quartz, it can exist in a variety of forms (e.g. tridymite, cristobalite). Mica and mullite are good examples of materials used in ceramics exclusively for their mineralogy, not their chemistry. Many ceramic minerals are silicates. Minerals have specific melting temperatures and well-defined events in their thermal decomposition history. Materials are mixtures of minerals and material powders are mixtures of microscopic mineral particles.

A good example of the relationship between the mineralogy of materials and their chemistry is understanding that quartz mineral and silica glass have vastly different physical properties. Quartz is the common mineral form of silica. It is one of the least thermal-expansion-tolerant minerals (1.5% at 2000F). So, how is it that adding quartz powder to glazes does the opposite, reducing their thermal expansion? It is because it dissolves in the melt to become a glass, it is no longer crystalline. Silica glass has an exceptionally low thermal expansion. Fused silica, for example, is made by melting quartz and suddenly cooling it so quickly that it does not get a chance to crystallize. This produces one of the lowest thermal expansion materials available (0.2% at 2000F). Some industries use fused silica slabs weighing more than a ton as valves in large pipes where temperatures are not only high but suddenly change, yet these slabs do not crack. But they have a severe limitation: At plant shut-downs, they must be replaced. Why? Because as they cool they recrystallize, turning back into quartz, completely losing their low thermal expansion! The point is that quartz and silica glass are the same chemically, SiO₂. The cooled slabs look the same. But mineralogically there are very different.

Understanding minerals also involves understanding how CO2 and H₂O incorporate into the crystal structure of so many minerals and how to adapt a firing process to withstand expulsion or how to process the mineral to take these out and store it to keep them out.

A good example of where a potter needs to consider mineralogy is when he is formulating a clay-based engobe to apply over earthenware or low-fire stoneware. The amount of quartz mineral in the body and slip must match fairly closely to minimize the chances of the slip-body bond being compromised as the piece is cooled through quartz inversion. He also can utilize a mix of calcined and raw kaolins (two different mineral forms of the same material) to control the shrinkage properties of the slip while maintaining the fired character.

More technical definition from Richard Willis: The crystallized aggregates of atomic elements, morphologically distinguishable by 32 possible geometrical shapes (symmetry elements and their combinations) which in turn can be grouped into six crystal systems according to the complexity of their symmetries: isometric, hexagonal, tetragonal, orthorhombic, monoclinic, and triclinic. The aggregates (elements combined to form a given mineral) are determined by chemical bonding, which can occur electrostatically by electron-sharing, metallicazation, or residualization. Bonding affects hardness, density, solubility, melting point, tenacity, specific gravity, magnetism, structural properties, colors, etc. Subsequently, minerals can be classified into 11 groups according to chemical and physical properties: native elements, sulphides, sulfosalts, oxides and hydroxides, halides, carbonates, nitrates, borates, sulphates, phosphates, and silicates.

Related Information

When both mineralogy and chemistry are shown on a data sheet

Some material data sheets show both the oxide and mineralogical analyses. Dolomite, for example, is composed of calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate minerals, these can be separated mechanically. Although this material participates in the glaze melt to source the MgO and CaO (which are oxides), it's mineralogy (the calcium and magnesium carbonates) specifically accounts for the unique way it decomposes and melts.

Comparing glaze melt fluidity balls with their chemistries

Ten-gram GBMF test balls of these three glazes were fired to cone 6 on porcelain tiles. Notice the difference in the degree of melt? Why? You could just say glaze 2 has more frit and feldspar. But we can dig deeper. Compare the yellow and blue numbers: Glaze 2 and 3 have much more B₂O₃ (boron, the key flux for cone 6 glazes) and lower SiO₂ (silica, it is refractory). That is a better explanation for the much greater melting. But notice that glaze 2 and 3 have the same chemistry, but 3 is melting more? Why? Because of the mineralogy of Gerstley Borate. It yields its boron earlier in the firing, getting the melting started sooner. Notice it also stains the glaze amber, it is not as clean as the frit. Notice the calculated thermal expansions: The greater melting or #2 and #3 comes at a cost, their thermal expansions are considerably higher, so they will be more likely to craze. Which of these is the best for functional ware? #1, G2926B. Its high SiO₂ and enough-but-not-too-much B₂O₃ make it more durable. And it runs less during firing. And does not craze.

USGS Mineral Commodity Report

A great reference if you are interested in the supply side of ceramic minerals. Many of the minerals dealt with in this report are ceramics-related. For example, did you know there are 160 companies mining clay in the US! They mine 4.5 million tons (mt) of bentonite, 6mt of kaolin, 1mt of ball clay, 11mt of common clay. What are the ton prices? Check for yourself.

Links

By Tony Hansen Follow me on

Got a Question?

Buy me a coffee and we can talk