Monthly Tech-Tip from Tony Hansen SignUp

No tracking! No ads!

200 mesh | 325 mesh | 3D Design | 3D Printer | 3D Printing Clay | 3D Slicer | 3D-Printing | Abrasion Ceramics | Acidic Oxides | Agglomeration | AI in Ceramics | Alkali | Alkaline Earths | Amorphous | Apparent porosity | Artware | Ball milling | Bamboo Glaze | Base Glaze | Base-Coat Dipping Glaze | Basic Oxides | Batch Recipe | Bisque | | Black Core | Bleeding of colors | Blender Mixing | Blunging | Body Bloating | Body glaze Interface | Body Warping | Bone China | Borate | Boron Blue | Boron Frit | Borosilicate | Breaking Glaze | Brick Making | Brushing Glaze | Calcination | Calculated Thermal Expansion | Candling | Carbon Burnout | Carbon trap glazes | CAS Numbers | Casting-Jiggering | Catch Glaze | Celadon Glaze | Ceramic | Ceramic Binder | Ceramic Decals | Ceramic Glaze | Ceramic Glaze Defects | Ceramic Ink | Ceramic Material | Ceramic Oxide | Ceramic Slip | Ceramic Stain | Ceramic Tile | Ceramics | Characterization | Chemical Analysis | Chromaticity | Clay | Clay body | Clay Body Porosity | Clay Stiffness | Clays for Ovens and Heaters | Co-efficient of Thermal Expansion | Code Numbering | Coil pottery | Colloid | Colorant | Commercial hobby brushing glazes | Cone 1 | Cone 5 | Cone 6 | Cone plaque | Copper Red | Cordierite Ceramics | Crackle glaze | Cristobalite | Cristobalite Inversion | Crucible | Crystalline glazes | Crystallization | Cuerda Seca | Cutlery Marking | Decomposition | Deflocculation | Deoxylidration | Differential thermal analysis | Digitalfire Foresight | Digitalfire Insight | Digitalfire Reference Library | Dimpled glaze | Dip Glazing | Dipping Glaze | Dishwasher Safe | Dolomite Matte | Drop-and-Soak Firing | Drying Crack | Drying Performance | Drying Shrinkage | Dunting | Dust Pressing | Earthenware | Efflorescence | Encapsulated Stain | Engobe | Eutectic | Fast Fire Glazes | Fat Glaze | Feldspar Glazes | Fining Agent | Firebrick | Fireclay | Fired Strength | Firing Schedule | Firing Shrinkage | Flameware | Flashing | Flocculation | Fluid Melt Glazes | Flux | Food Safe | Foot Ring | Forming Method | Formula Ratios | Formula Weight | Frit | Fritware | Functional | GHS Safety Data Sheets | Glass vs. Crystalline | Glass-Ceramic Glazes | Glaze Blisters | Glaze Bubbles | Glaze Chemistry | Glaze Compression | Glaze Crawling | Glaze Crazing | Glaze Durability | Glaze fit | Glaze Gelling | Glaze laydown | Glaze Layering | Glaze Mixing | Glaze Recipes | Glaze shivering | Glaze Shrinkage | Glaze thickness | Globally Harmonized Data Sheets | Glossy Glaze | Green Strength | Grog | Gunmetal glaze | High Temperature Glaze | Hot Pressing | Incised decoration | Industrial clay body | Ink Jet Printing | Inside-only Glazing | Insight-Live | Iron Red Glaze | Jasper Ware | Jiggering | Kaki | Kiln Controller | Kiln Firing | Kiln fumes | Kiln venting system | Kiln Wash | Kneading clay | Kovar Metal | Laminations | Leaching | Lead in Ceramic Glazes | Leather hard | Limit Formula | Limit Recipe | Liner Glaze | Liner glazing | Liquid Bright Colors | LOI | Low Temperature Glaze | Majolica | Marbling | Material Substitution | Matte Glaze | Maturity | Maximum Density | MDT | Mechanism | Medium Temperature Glaze | Melt Fluidity | Melting Temperature | Metal Oxides | Metallic Glazes | Micro Organisms | Microwave Safe | Mineral phase | Mineralogy | Mocha glazes | Mohs Hardness | Mole% | Monocottura | Mosaic Tile | Mottled | Mullite Crystals | Native Clay | Non Oxide Ceramics | Oil-spot glaze | Once fire glazing | Opacifier | Opacity | Ovenware | Overglaze | Oxidation Firing | Oxide Formula | Oxide Interaction | Oxide System | Particle orientation | Particle Size Distribution | Particle Sizes | PCE | Permeability | Phase Diagram | Phase Separation | Physical Testing | Pinholing | Plainsman Clays | Plaster Bat | Plaster table | Plasticine | Plasticity | Plucking | Porcelain | Porcelaineous Stoneware | Pour Glazing | Powder Processing | Precipitation | Primary Clay | Primitive Firing | Propane | Propeller Mixer | Pugmill | Pyroceramics | Pyrometric Cone | Quartz Inversion | Raku | Reactive Glazes | Reduction Firing | Reduction Speckle | Refiring Ceramics | Refractory | Refractory Ceramic Coatings | Representative Sample | Restaurant Ware | Rheology | Rutile Blue Glazes | Salt firing | Sanitary ware | Sculpture | Secondary Clay | Shino Glazes | Sieve | Sieve Shaker | Silica:Alumina Ratio | Silk screen printing | Sintering | Slaking | Slip Casting | Slip Trailing | Slipware | Slurry | Slurry Processing | Slurry Up | Soaking | Soluble colors | Soluble Salts | Specific gravity | Splitting | Spray Glazing | Stain Medium | Stoneware | Stull Chart | Sulfate Scum | Sulfates | Surface Area | Surface Tension | Suspension | Tapper Clay | Tenmoku | Terra Cotta | Terra Sigilatta | Test Kiln | Theoretical Material | Thermal Conductivity | Thermal shock | Thermocouple | Thixotropy | Throwing | Tony Hansen | Toxicity | Trafficking | Translucency | Transparent Glazes | Triaxial Glaze Blending | Ultimate Particles | Underglaze | Unity Formula | Upwork | Variegation | Viscosity | Vitreous | Vitrification | Volatiles | Water in Ceramics | Water Smoking | Water Solubility | Wedging | Whiteware | Wood Ash Glaze | Wood Firing | Zero3 | Zero4 | Zeta Potential

Bit Image

From ceramic production to pottery we need to take photos, knowing something about the file formats and working with them saves money, time, the environment.

Key phrases linking here: bit image, photoshop, gimp - Learn more

Details

Digital photographs are "bit images". Ceramic artists and technicians must deal with them constantly, knowing something about the subject is valuable. A bit image exists as a file on your computer or on a server on the internet. Bit images are a matrix of tiny dots (pixels) each having a color and transparency. The image as a whole has "dimensions", a 1000x1000 dot image thus has one million dots. For print purposes, an image as a whole can also have an implicit dpi "resolution" (dots per inch). The 1000x1000 dot image can be said to have a resolution of 100 dpi at 10 inches or 200 dpi at 5 inches size. Obviously, storing information on every pixel will take significant memory (on your computer or in the cloud). The capacity of computers to deal with billions of pixels in an instant is a testament to their speed.

Image files have a "format", a way of encoding the pixels. Formats have advantages and disadvantages. Common formats are jpg, gif and png. GIF limits the number of colors to 256 (to reduce file size) but it does have an animation capability. PNG saves all pixels as-as, JPG groups pixels and compromises the colors of some to create patterns that enable a reduction in file size (thus each time a JPG is saved some quality is lost). PNG and GIF pictures can have transparency.

Almost any photo you take needs to be edited. Cropping is typically the first thing done. While photo editing software like GIMP and PhotoShop are well known, computers and phones have photo editing capabilities built in. These can typically save to other formats. However, computer vendors (who also market cloud storage) have an interest in keeping your photos in the largest file size possible. For this reason, is it good to use a third-party app that enables resolution and degree-of-compression control.

Every time you upload a photo to the cloud you impact the environment (by the size of the file). How? Data warehouses that store all this stuff are the size of shopping malls fed with electrical cables the size of a firehose! Dozens of nuclear power plants are needed to run all that. So think about resolution and image compression.

What resolution is right? As a guide, consider the resolution of your computer's monitor and your phone's display. HD monitors are 2000 pixels wide. Phones are commonly that height. A 4k photo would be twice as wide and more than twice as tall, that means it is four times the needed size. While the larger image would permit zoom, consider the extra time to load it. Better to crop the original image before uploading. In that way, its actual size on the screen will enable quicker viewing (and faster display).

What compression is right? When JPG images are saved a compression percentage can be specified. Higher ones take more space. Really high (e.g. 85% or more) can take dramatically more space. Compare results to see what is best, typically 70% is fine. Consider a best-case scenario: Your camera produces a poorly focussed 4000x4000 image of 5mb in size. You edit that image in a photo editor, cropping it and reducing the resolution to 1600px wide (which sharpens it) and save it as a JPG image with 70% quality. That saved image could easily be 250k in size, 20 times smaller (and it looks better).

Related Information

Cutting out the background to perfect edges

Tap picture for full size and resolution

Don’t be fooled. Yes, white backgrounds are possible with just good lighting. And many AI tools (apps and web services) promise “easy background removal” - but they will quickly disappoint you. But pros use path editing tools to produce perfect antialiased edges. Nothing else comes close. Traditionally done in Photoshop this is now possible on a smartphone. On the lower left is the original image (already cropped). On the lower right it is open in Exacto, an iOS/Android app (watching the short help animations is a must to learn it). The blue dots are anchors and black ones can pull curves between them. Easy zooming on a smartphone makes the process practical. Exacto exports to Photos with a transparent background. This method makes busy backgrounds a non-issue, lighting can be focussed on how the object looks rather than the delicate balance of white background and a washed-out object.

Same photo on my Nikon D-3500 and iPhone 8

Tap picture for full size and resolution

The camera shot (top) is higher resolution, but not alot. Focus on the edges is better but I it could still be improved.
But the iPhone colors are more vibrant. On the camera-shot the red, orange and yellow are washed out against the white background. Surfaces are softer on the camera-shot. I am guessing that as I learn to use the camera better it will improve. An aspect of the camera is that the screen does not have the quality the iPhone has so it is more difficult to tell if it is adjusted and focussed right.

Using a camera instead of a phone for your picture taking? Beware

Tap picture for full size and resolution

Taking a picture on a modern smart phone is easy. And you can just walk over to your desktop computer and it is there automatically (e.g. for editing and uploading to your account at insight-live.com). Cameras are capable of taking better pictures, but time and dedication are required. But don't overlook the difficultly of getting photos from your camera to your desktop computer. Camera software (to transfer the data, edit photos, store and share them) is not nearly as polished a phone apps. Transfer can be awkward and glacial (e.g. 10 minutes per photo!). If you already have a camera and this is an issue, consider getting one of these SD cards (e.g. on Amazon). This turns your camera into a router/website that you access by switching your wifi to it. And transfer is fast.

The difference lighting can make in photos

Tap picture for full size and resolution

This is the same piece in sunlight and a fluorescent flood lamp. The picture was taken by an iPhone and then cropped to a white background using the path tool in Photoshop. The whole mug is glazed with GA10-B. The inside and upper outside of the leather hard piece was engobed using L3954N.

By Tony Hansen
Follow me on

Got a Question?

Buy me a coffee and we can talk



https://digitalfire.com, All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy