|Monthly Tech-Tip |
Some of the key tests needed to really understand what a clay is and what it can be used for can be done with inexpensive equipment and simple procedures. These practical tests can give you a better picture than a data sheet full of numbers.
Mining the Battle Formation in Ravenscrag, Saskatchewan - June 2018
Few things are as exciting as finding your own clay materials and then using them to make your own pottery. Especially if the items you make are strong, durable, functional and safe. Given the effort, you likely won't save money compared to buying prepared bodies (unless you use a lot of clay and can scale up the processing). But in some situations, it is better. It can raise the market value of your ware. And give you bragging rights! And satisfaction.
Can anyone evaluate found clay materials? Test them? Yes. If it’s below the topsoil and it’s not sand and it is plastic it is (or contains) clay. Plainsman Clays has mined a wide range of its own clay materials since 1965 and has a very practical set of inexpensive tests to characterize them. My work there inspired the development and refinement of these tests and the creation of digitalfire.com and the Digitalfire Reference Library.
Where do you find clay? Everywhere. Well, almost. If you take a shovel into your backyard, how deep can you dig before you hit rock? In some places, it is only inches. In other places hundreds, even thousands of feet. But almost everywhere, within driving distance, you will be able to find places where there are sedimentary layers (except perhaps if you live on a limestone island!). By the magic of the water cycle, weathering and erosion planet-earth is a sand and clay-making machine! Talk to local people who need to dig in the ground; road construction companies, gravel companies, builders, farmers, electrical and municipal utilities. When you talk to people, listen for terms like 'gumbo', 'river silt', 'sticky', 'stream bed', 'hard to dig; these are your triggers to investigate!
Testing your own native clays is easier than you think
Some simple equipment is all you need. You can do practical tests to characterize a local clay in your own studio or workshop (e.g. our SHAB test, DFAC test, SIEV test, LDW test). You need a gram scale (preferably accurate to 0.01g) and a set of callipers (check Amazon.com). Some metal sieves (search "Tyler Sieves" on Ebay). A stamp to mark samples with code and specimen numbers. A plaster table or slab. A propeller mixer. And, of course, a test kiln. And you need a place to put all the measurement data collected and learn from it (e.g. an account at insight-live.com).
Characterization is a key concept here. It means that you know how to describe that clay you have found. Could you put it on a potter's wheel and make a thin-walled piece? Is it sticky? Does it take a long time to dry? These things mean it is plastic. Does it have high drying shrinkage? Does it crack on drying? Is it fine particled? Does it contain impurities that must be screened out? Does it have soluble salts? At what temperature will it mature in the kiln (that is, be dense and strong)? Does it have a high firing shrinkage? What color does it fire? How does the color, density and shrinkage progress over a range of temperatures? Does it fit your glazes? The answers to all of these questions are a matter of judgement. If you have used plenty of commercial clay bodies, then you already have frame-of-references with which to compare native materials. Knowing the answers to questions like these will tell you what to mix it them (e.g. silica, feldspar, ball clay, kaolin). If you have multiple materials, knowing their individual characters will often enable mixing them to produce a 100% native body. Or, one having as high a percentage of native clay as possible.
Another important factor is to lose whatever fear you have of putting something unknown in the kiln. Fine particled clays are not going to explode! The worst that can happen is they melt. So you just put them on refractory tiles (which you can make using a fireclay (or ball clay/kaolin mix).
Reason 1 for record keeping in an insight-live.com account
Notes. It is a much better place to take notes than that old binder you use. And the chance of losing them is the same as the chance of losing the phone that you access them with. No, wait, it is way less. Because any internet connected phone or device with a browser can be used.
Another factor for success is to learn to think like a mad scientist! That will motivate you. It will also turn you into a compulsive note-taker and record-keeper. And today’s mad scientist takes a lot of before-and-after and this-vs-that pictures, and he/she knows how to use Photoshop (or similar). It will help you weather failures, regarding them as education and a path to eventual success. This is important, especially if you are testing multiple clays. And working over a long period. An audit trail of data, notes and pictures and knowing how to interpret these is a key to being able to characterize a clay. That is why I created Insight-live.com, it is the place where you document all your work. Follow this path and you will learn how to describe your clays to others in succinct and nerdy language! Developing both right-brained and left-brained thinking patterns will make your work as an artist or crafts person so much better. And think of how valuable the data you accumulate will be for those workshops you are going to do?
In doing thorough testing work you will start to look at the commercial materials you have always used with a more critical eye. And understand them better. You will see that the results of the practical tests you can do yourself yield more valuable information than all those numbers on the datasheets for those materials!
Mixing clay bodies is not like mixing glazes. Glaze chemistry is a key predictor of fired results, but with clay materials, it is the physics (e.g. plasticity, color, shrinkage, particle size, maturing temperature). It is exciting when you can start to mentally model the working properties of plastic clays by visualizing the particles, their mineralogy, sizes, shapes, surface area and interactivity with water and each other.
This early field test on raw lump clays involves dripping some vinegar (or 50% muriatic acid, HCl) on a specimen. Fizzing is a predictor of serious efflorescence issues. But do not over-react if it is not a lot, some soluble salts are OK. And you can use barium carbonate to precipitate them.
Raw lumps vs. powdered form of the same raw clay
You can learn a lot just from a lump of the material. If wet lumps smell bad they likely contain decaying plant matter, that will cause issues (watch out for clays dug close to the surface where animals graze, obviously these can contain organic hazards). If raw lumps are grey or black they might contain lignite (a classic sign of ball clay). Slake and wash some through a fine screen (e.g. 100 mesh that you can buy on eBay) to see what it catches. During firing, organic particles create gases that can bubble-damage glazes, or bloat or black-core bodies. If you have a big lump, note if it cracks into many smaller ones during drying (this indicates good plasticity). Using a hammer, break dried lumps into smaller ones. Do they resist breakage or turn to powder (non-plastic clays can be very fragile, plastics can be amazingly hard). When there are nodules or stringers of iron, carbon or calcium on broken surfaces you can gauge their impact by firing some of the lumps. That will also provide initial information on firing properties.
The term "slaking" refers to the breakdown that normally occurs when a dry clay lump is immersed in water (again, it must be dry, damp plastic clays will not generally slake because existing water creates a barrier to further penetration). Clays that slake well will break down completely in water and stir or propeller-mix to a smooth slurry. To be plastic the slaking should proceed as shown.
Slaking. What is that?
A slaking clay bar (of a typical pottery clay). On the left the clay bar has been in the water for around 10 seconds. On the right, after a couple minutes, the rate of slaking has increased dramatically, the corners are disintegrating. Watching this process can be addictive! In about 20 minutes this bar will disappear into a pile on the bottom. Slaking happens most quickly when the sample is completely dry. High plasticity clays take longer (like this one). Slaking can be used to prepare clays for use: Dry the lumps, break them down using a hammer, put them in water, wait (less than 30 minutes for typical pottery plasticity), propeller mix, screen out impurities, then dewater to plastic state.
If you have a raw lump sample then slaking properties will be evident during the preparation of a plastic sample. Sprinkle 1.5 lb of that material into water (lumps should be small e.g. 1/2 inch). During the process take the opportunity to note if the slurry is lumpy or sandy or if shale and grit settle on the bottom (of course this will mean that screening or grinding could be needed during production processing. Also note if the slurry gels, this indicates thixotropic behavior. Also, is there organic material floating on top?
However it is best to also slake one of the test bars later in the process, as shown here (these are specimens of consistent size and shape enabling comparative observation). Note that if there are soluble salts on some surfaces of the bar these may slow the onset of slaking.
Pouring the slurry on a plaster table to dewater it
Pottery plaster is highly absorbent, it can remove the water from this thick slurry, made from a 5 kg powder mix, in an hour. Slurries of higher water content dewater much quicker, a 1 kg mix can be ready in minutes. This table weighs 400 lbs dry, but smaller ones are equally practical for smaller test batches. Plaster tables are much more practical in arid climates, it is dry here so one this size can supply enough clay for production of a potter. In wetter climates ductwork can be installed within the plaster and air pressure can be used to dewater the table. If you need one of these, photos are linked to our plaster table article.
Pour the slurry onto a plaster bat of sufficient size (if you do not have one make one). It is worth noting the dewatering behavior. Fine-particled clays have ultimate sizes much smaller than a micron (especially bentonitic materials). These can lay on a plaster slab for many hours (even days) while dewatering. And when you peel them up for wedging they will be sticky and messy, requiring smearing them down on the batt again. Larger particled plastic materials (e.g. ball clays) may not be as sticky but will require peel-up, wedging and lay-down multiple times. By contrast, large-particled clays, like kaolins, have 5-10 micron particles. These may dewater in minutes and require vigilance to not end up too stiff. Sandy and silty materials dewater even faster. Clays containing lots of silt and sand often separate during dewatering, the fine clay component migrating against the plaster (with the water) and the silt and particulates layered above.
If a difficult-to-clean film forms on your plaster slab after dry-out it likely means the clay contains soluble salts.
Sufficient plasticity is indicated if a rolled cigar shape can be bent without splitting. Native clays often have excessive plasticity and pass this test easily. They can be so sticky that they cannot be rolled or shaped. Or they need to have such a low water content, to not be sticky, that they are difficult to work with. It might be necessary to mix these with a non-plastic to continue testing. A standard in many labs is to mix it 50:50 with silica powder (commonly done with ball clays and bentonites). A problem with this approach is getting inaccurate fired property results. So, another option, involving more effort is to powderize some of the test material, calcine it and mix 50:50 calcine:raw (this enables a true picture of the fired properties later). Non-plastic clays present a similar challenge, often they cannot be formed into test bars, or even if they are, the dried bars are so fragile it is impractical to handle them. It is common for labs to mix such clays with ball clay, perhaps 25% to make them workable. However, to get more reliable fired property results it is better to mix with bentonite, typically 5% is enough.
Preparing clay test bars to measure plastic, dry and fired physical properties
This is being done for SHAB, LOI and DFAC tests. The clay was wedged thoroughly, rolled to 3/8 thickness (using the metal rods as gauges) and then cut to 4 1/4" by 1" bars. Code numbers and specimen numbers are stamped on each (these are needed to enter data into our account at Insight-live). For example, notice that the bars have specimen numbers from 1 to 6. These will be fired at six different temperatures (for a low-temperature body, for example, we fire cone 06, 04, 03, 02, 01, 1, 2). The data measured from each, including the temperature, will be entered for each bar (specimen). The 12cm dia. disk is being cut from 3/16" thickness. Notice how these clay tears as cut, this is an indication of the low plasticity of this native clay material. And notice the greenish color, that is typical of terra cotta clays.
Tendency to allow water penetration and water splitting is indicated if you balance a cigar-shaped piece on your finger, put a couple of drops on the top center and splits begin to form quickly (clays with coarser grains and lower plasticity have advantages but can be susceptible to water splitting).
When the clay is suitable for forming, I roll slabs (using metal bars as roller guides) and carefully lay them on 12cm wide boards for cutting. If the clay is sticky it will be difficult to peel up, it might be necessary to roll it on newspaper, or plaster. For very non-plastic clays (that are too weak with withstand peeling up) a similar approach might be needed: Repeat cycles of rolling it a little thinner (between sheets of newspaper), peeling away the top layer and replacing it with a new piece, flipping the board on to another and replacing that newspaper, then repeating. It will split at the edges, so roll the piece big enough so that the final flip onto the 12cm board leaves enough to cut.
Once the clay is on the board, cutting along both sides produces a 12 cm wide strip that can be sectioned, using a wooden ruler and thin-bladed knife, into 2.5cm (1”) wide bars. Be careful to cut vertically so the bars will stand on edge for firing. If the clay is sticky the ruler sticks. If it is very non-plastic it will be difficult to cut the bars without tears (use a compressing rather than cutting motion with the knife for these).
Make 5 or 6 bars. Stamp the identification and a sequential specimen number on each. Carefully make 10cm-apart marks on each bar, ones that can be accurately measured after drying and firing. Make a half-length bar (for an LOI test).
Roll a 5 mm (3/16”) thick slab and cut a 12 cm diameter drying test disk and put it on the board with the bars (place a plaster small soup can in the center, leaving only the outer part of the disk exposed).
Many native and commercial clays contain soluble materials (e.g. sulphates) that come to the surface with the water and leave solute behind that melts into a dirty glassy surface layer. This is a universal problem in the ceramic industry. In structural products it is dealt with by the addition of barium carbonate (0.2-0.4%). During clay processing, it reacts with the sulphates to produce insoluble carbonates and barium sulphate.
On the circular drying disk (made above) solubles from the center migrate with the water to the outer exposed section and concentrate there during drying producing obvious differences in the surface coloration. Note the solubles deposits around the edges of the disk. Fire it to see if they visually impair the fired surface (soluble salts usually melt like a glaze so they are actually an asset to fired functionality).
Note the nature and number of cracks on the circular drying disk and record (use the method described for the SHAB test).
Completely dry the bars (under heat or in the sun). Clean the bars using a knife to remove corner burs. Plastic clays are strong and hard to trim. Highly plastic ones shrink a lot and warp the bars during drying. Super plastics (e.g. bentonite) crack the bars. Non-plastics have soft edges, chip easily and are fragile to handle. Kaolins feel smooth and soapy on cut edges.
Break one of the dried bars and rate it, based on your experience of the strength of kaolin, ball clay, fireclay, etc.
Record the weight of the half-width bar and calculate water content as wet weight – dry weight / wet weight * 100. Kaolins have water contents of less than 20%, stonewares 20-23% and ball clays, even more, bentonites can be 30%+
Record the average dry shrinkage of all the bars (shrinkage is simply 100 minus the dry length). 7% shrinkage is high but can be tolerated if dry strength is good and coarse particles are available to terminate micro-cracks and prevent warping. 5% shrinkage is low and normally accompanied by poor dry strength and low plasticity.
This is what labs use to measure particle size
To measure particle size in a slurry or powder you need sieves. This is the most popular type used in labs. They are made from brass by a company named Tyler. The range of screen sizes for testing particle size is very wide (obvious here: the top screen has an opening of 56 mm, the bottom one 0.1 mm - the wires are almost too small to see). You can often buy these used on Ebay for a lot less than new ones, search for "tyler sieve". The finer sieves (especially 200) are fragile and more easily ripped. It is good to have a 50, 100 and 150.
Knowing the identity, amount, sizes, and proportions of sizes of particles in a sample is important (the feel of a material can actually be misleading). Apparent particles and ultimate particles are different (apparent particles are agglomerations of ultimate particles). Clays with a lot of harmful +100 mesh impurity particles (e.g. sand, shale, quartz, iron-bearing rock) may be useable if your ware can tolerate some fired speckle. Even +50 mesh particles can be tolerated for stonewares and earthenware. But for fine functional ware, you will need a way to screen out +100 mesh sizes (see links below). If the clay contains a lot of quartz sand remember that these particles expand and contract suddenly as they pass upwards and downwards through quartz-inversion (about 1050F) producing micro-cracks around each grain in the rigid fired matrix. Such materials obviously must be fired slower.
The apparent particle size is determined by washing material through a series of progressively finer sieves. Wash 50 grams through a 100 and 200 mesh screen (piled on top of each other). Dry the screens and weigh the material on each (and multiply by 2 for percentage). Examine the particles on the 100# under and 50X light scope or microscope (available on Amazon). Are they quartz sand? Hard clay or shale? Lignite? Flakes of mica? Dark particles of iron or manganese material?
A terra cotta clay fired from cone 06 (bottom) to 4
Terra cotta bodies are more volatile in the kiln than stonewares. They mature rapidly over a narrower range of temperatures, that process is accompanied by dramatic changes in fired color, density and fired strength. These bars are fired (bottom to top) at cone 06, 04, 03, 02, 2 and 4. This is Plainsman BGP (a quarry material), cone 02 finds it at maximum density (and fired shrinkage). At cone 06 (1830F/1000C) it is porous and shrinks very little. But as it approaches and passes cone 03 (1950F/1070C) the color deepens and then moves toward brown at cone 02 (where it reaches maximum density and stoneware strength). However, past cone 02 it becomes unstable, beginning to melt (as indicated by negative shrinkage). This is typical of most terra cotta clay materials.
For this part of the test it is necessary to have a small test kiln. I would not live, as a potter, without one! Using your experience of firing the initial lumps, guess the maturing temperature. Then fire bars to one or two cones higher and lower. If needed in your application, fire one of the bars at an accelerated rate (compared to your typical firing) up to 500F to see if it can withstand faster firing.
Fire the half-length bar to at least cone 02, record its weight and calculate LOI (Loss On Ignition) as dry weight – fired weight / dry weight * 100. Clays that contain organic matter lose weight on firing, for obvious reasons (often 7% or more). Much of this amount is crystal-bound water, but it is surprising how much smoke can be present in a rising 500F kiln.
Fire all the bars accurately. Record the temperature reached according to the degree-of-bend of the three cones (see my article interpreting cones).
Photo not found
or not published
Measure the distance between marks on each fired bar and record fired shrinkage as dry length – fired length / dry length * 100.
Record the weight of each bar, then boil all fired bars for 5 hours and soak for 19, blot dry and record the weight again. Record porosity is wet weight – dry weight / dry weight * 100. Plot a chart showing percentage porosity and shrinkage against temperature. Compare this chart with one for a standard commercial body you use with success. Vitreous stoneware bodies are best tuned to fire at the point where porosity and shrinkage curves are levelling out before reversing direction. Red earthenwares give the best results at least 2-3 cones before they suddenly change color to dark brown. Sculpture bodies need a compromise of fired strength with resistance to fired warping.
The above testing should indicate the best firing temperature for the material. Apply a typical transparent glaze to a dry and bisque-fired bar or disk of the clay, fire and then stress its fit with immersions in ice and boiling water. If it crazes the clay has a low thermal expansion and is likely low in quartz. If it shivers the clay is likely high in quartz and would be a good body ingredient to prevent crazing.
Now that you know what the material is in relation to kaolin, ball clay, fireclay, stoneware and bentonite; put it into recipes accordingly. Don’t be tempted to use it alone as a body, it should at least be diluted to dampen changes in properties over time. To use as much as possible in a body, find other materials with complementing strengths and weaknesses.
These test bars are an example of how much can be learned from firing a clay to many temperatures.
Do you want to go to the next step and really learn how to test materials and compile the test results in an organized way? There is a lot more information in the Digitalfire Reference Library (including a glossary). And get a subscription to Insight-Live.com so you can start keeping records.
A practical example: Look for the link below: "It Starts With A Lump of Clay". This is part of the Insight-live.com instruction manual. It shows, from start to finish, how I went about testing two lumps of clay. We have done this thousands of times and have several hundred thousand test measurements in our Insight-Live.com account!
These have already been measured to deduce drying shrinkage. After firing they will be measured again to calculate the firing shrinkage. Then they will be weighed, boiled in water and weighed again to determine the water absorption. Fired shrinkage and absorption are good indicators of body maturity.
We tested four different clays (brought in by customers). One is from BC and three from Alberta. These fired sample bars show rich color, low soluble salts and high density and strength at very low temperatures. L4233 (left): Cone 06 to 3 (bottom to top). Reaches stoneware-density at cone 02 (middle bar). Plasticity is very low (drying shrinkage is only 4.5%). But, it is stable even if over-fired. L4254 (center bottom): Cone 04,02,3,4 (bottom to top). Very fine particled but contains an organic that is gassing and bloating the middle two bars. L4243: Fires lighter and looks stable here (cone 02,01,1,2 shown) but melts suddenly less than a cone above the top bar (well before vitrification is reached). L4242 (right): Hyper-plastic, with 12% drying shrinkage! Already melting by cone 02 (third from top). Achieves almost zero porosity (porcelain density) at cone 04 (#2 bar). Even when mixed with 20% kaolin and 20% silica it still hits zero porosity by cone 1. What next? I'll mix L4233 (left) and L4242 (right), that should produce stoneware density at cone 02 (about 1% porosity).
"It Starts With a Lump of Clay", a step-by-step Insight-Live.com tutorial (from its help system and the link below) on how to document every step (in an account at insight-live.com) of testing a raw clay. You will learn about drying shrinkage, drying performance, particle size distribution, plasticity, firing shrinkage, fired porosity, fired color, soluble salt content, fired strength, etc. We will not just observe these properties, but measure them. In doing so we will characterize the material. We will answer simple questions about how the material forms, dries and fires across a range of temperatures. In doing the testing I will be generating a lot of data. No single factor is more intimidating to new technicians than what to do with this data, how and where to store it, how it can be searched, learned from, compared.
Plainsman Clays extracts 6 different sedimentary clays from this quarry (Mel knows where the layers separate). The dried test bars on the right show them (top to bottom). The range of properties exhibited is astounding. The top-most layer is the most plastic and has the most iron concretion particles (used in our most speckled reduction bodies). The bottom one is the least plastic and most silty (the base for Ravenscrag Slip). The middle two are complete buff stonewares made by mother nature (e.g. M340 and H550). A2, the second one down, is a ball clay (similar to commercial products like OM#4, Bell). A2 is refractory and the base for Plainsman Fireclay. The second from the bottom fires the whitest and is the most refractory (it is the base for H441G).
This little pot on the left is more than it appears. Both of these samples were fired at cone 01 and clear glazed in the green state (without bisquing). The one on the right, a typical unprocessed native terra cotta clay, is full of pinholes, the one on the left has none. But the one on the left has been pre-processed by mother nature: it is from a thick layer of clay found below a bog in northern Alberta. It has 21% water content, you just cut a piece out, wedge it and throw a pot! Although it contains some particulate, it is highly plastic yet dries well and fires to a dense stoneware-like hardness 11 cones lower than we normally make stoneware at.
This is made from 100% of a natural clay (3B) from the Whitemud formation in Ravenscrag, Saskatchewan. To make this body, which I call MNP, I slake and slurry up the raw clay lumps, sieve it to 200 mesh and then dewater on a plaster table. I rolled the plastic clay into a thin layer, cut it into a cross-shape using a 3D printed cookie-cutter, drape-molded it over a plaster form and then slip-joined the seams. It fires very dense and strong (to zero porosity like glass!). It holds together well and joins well with its own slip. Although not super plastic, it is smooth and fine-grained like a commercial porcelain body. I add 1-2% bentonite to make it more plastic when needed. It has the ability to be rolled extremely thin and yet does not warp in the firing! This mug has a weight-to-volume ratio of 2.08 (the weight of water it will hold compared to its own weight).
Fired at cone 6. It is impossibly vitreous, the surface is smooth like a glaze. And it has not warped. In fact, other pieces made from it having walls as thin as 2mm did not warp either!. This comes from a two-foot-thick section of the 3B layer from a Plainsman Clays quarry near Ravenscrag Saskatchewan, Canada. A cretaceous dust storm! It is plastic and feels impossibly smooth. Smoother than any commercial porcelain. It does not fire white because mother nature did include a little iron oxide. It accepts glaze like a porcelain.
Plainsman Clays did 6 weeks of mining in June-July 2018 in Ravenscrag, Saskatchewan. We extracted marine sediment layers of the late Cretaceous period. The center portion of the B layer is so fine that it must have wind-transported (impossibly smooth, like a body that is pure terra sigillata)! The feldspar and silica are built-in, producing the glassiest surface I have ever seen at cone 6 (2200F). Despite this, pieces are not warping in the firings! I have not glazed the outside of this mug for demo purposes. I got away with it this time because the Ravenscrag clear glaze is very compatible (similar thermal expansion). But with other less compatible glazes they cracked when I poured in hot coffee. This mug was the beginning of an exciting project the sieve out +325 mesh particles any make many more pieces.
This 50 lb lump is from a quarry where we are mining the Whitemud Formation in southern Saskatchewan. This layer is extracted from the top of a hill at the bottom of a valley, putting it more than 50 meters below the prairie surface. The lumps are extremely dense and very heavy. They are also quite damp, about 12% by weight fossil water. They exhibit this horizontal layering, a clear indication of the sedimentary nature of the deposit. The clay is exceedingly fine-particled and the silica present exists in rounded grains finer than about 150 mesh. There are flecks of high-carbon material and some tiny iron particles. When lumps like this dry out when exposed to the sun they break down into thousands of pure-white pieces. These dry lumps slake quickly in water to create a creamy smooth slurry from which I can easily sieve out the carbon and iron particles to produce the hyper-smooth natural porcelain.
Simple Physical Testing of Clays
Learn to test your clay bodies and clay materials and record the results in an organized way, understanding the purpose of each test and how to relate its results to changes that need to be made in process, recipe and materials.
Formulating a body using clays native to your area
Being able to mix your own clay body and glaze from native materials might seem ridiculous, yet Covid-19 taught us about the need for independence.
In ceramics, this normally refers to the process of doing physical or chemical testing on a raw material to accurately describe it in terms of similar ones.
What is clay? How is it different than dirt? For ceramics, the answer lies on the microscopic level with the particle shape, size and how the surfaces interact with water.
A clay that a potter finds, tests and learns to process and use himself. To reduce the costs of importing materials manufacturers, especially in Asia, often develop processes for clays mined in their locality.
A common problem with dry and fired ceramic. It is evident by the presence of a light or dark colored scum on the dry or fired surface.
Plasticity (in ceramics) is a property exhibited by soft clay. Force exerted effects a change in shape and the clay exhibits no tendency to return to the old shape. Elasticity is the opposite.
This term is using in ceramics to describe how a dry clay disintegrates when it is immersed in or exposed to water. Different clays have different slaking rates.
Case Study: Testing a Native Clay Using Insight-Live.com
ShowerShelf.com vibratory screen that fits the top of a five-gallon bucket
Industrial vibration motor at Amazon.com
About Plainsman Clays
Slurry Mixing and Dewatering Your Own Clay Body
Evaluating a clay's suitability for use in pottery
Would you like to be able to use your own found-clays in your production? Follow me as we evaluate a mystery clay sample provided by a potter who wants to do this.
SHAB Shrinkage and absorption test procedure for plastic clay bodies and materials
The DFAC Drying Factor test visually displays a plastic clay's response to very uneven drying. The test is extreme enough that almost all plastic clays will crack.
Sieve Analysis 35-325 Wet
SIEV particle size distribution test to evaluate and compare the particle size profiles of ceramic material powders
|By Tony Hansen|
Follow me on