The total weight of powder washed through the screens. When weighing, add the water content to the total weight. For example, if the water content is 2.5%, then weight out 102.5 grams.35M - 35 mesh (V)
The residue left on the 35 mesh screen after drying.48M - 48 mesh (V)
65M - 65 mesh (V)
100M - 100 mesh (V)
150M - 150 mesh (V)
200M - 200 mesh (V)
325M - 325 mesh (V)
NOTE - Note (V)
Use this to iddentify each specimen if more than one was done.
This test is best done using a Data Collection Fill-In form. Collect data on a number tests, then enter this into the computer in a batch.
Related information on the theory, purpose, procedure and interpretation for this test is available in the Magic of Fire II book.
2.1 This test is done to assess particle size of incoming material.
3.1 TYLER SIEVE NUMBER
A standard sieve numbering system using the W.S. Tyler Sieve Company.
The number of wires per inch on a testing sieve.
4.1 This procedure is carried out by the quality control technician on powder or dry samples provided by the receiver or collected in production.
5.1 If the material is supplied as a chunk of dry clay:
5.1.1 Break the chunk into small pellet no bigger than 3-4 mm and weigh out 100 grams.
5.1.2 Continue as for powder sample.
5.2 If the material is provided as a pugged wet sample:
5.2.1 Roll the pugged clay into a thin slab (about 5 mm) and dry it.
5.2.2 Continue as above for dried chunk.
5.3 Wash powder through sieves
5.3.1 Weigh 100 grams of powder or broken chunks and pour it into about a litre of water. Let stand for a few minutes for powder, for an hour for pellets.
5.3.2 Wash the water/powder mix through the 325# screen until all minus 325 material is gone. If some pellets do not break down well, wash with hot water, or dry the sieve as is and wash a second time.
5.3.3 Reverse wash the oversize material back into the water container.
5.3.4 Stack the sieves from finest to coarsest, with finest at the bottom, and wash the plus 325 material through the stack. Thoroughly spray the material on each sieve to encourage all finer material to fall through each.
5.3.5 Dissassemble the stack of sieves and set in warm area to dry.
5.3.6 Write the material iddentification on a new line on the SIEV logsheet.
5.3.7 Use a brush to remove the oversize material from each screen and weigh it. Write the weight on the logsheet.
5.3.8 Enter the data into the computer using the correct ID# for the body or material. If an ID# does not already exist, assign one.
5.4.1 Tyler root of two series of interlocking testing sieves with soft seive brush.
5.4.2 .01 gram balance
5.4.3 Drying area
5.4.4 Spraying hose and sink
5.5.1 Brass sieves can get very hot if dried near a heat source; be careful not to get burned.
5.5.2 Mixing clay/water slurries can generate a lot of dust. Take measures to reduce it and not breathe it.
5.6.1 Carefully wash all material through each sieve with a repeated back and forth motion.
5.6.2 Do not use too high pressure as this could splatter some of the material out of the sieve.
5.6.3 Wash all material through the finest sieve first, then stack them all up and wash the remainder through. This is a necessity to prevent blinding that causes water overflows and material loss on the finer meshes.
5.6.4 Wash the oversize to the centre of each sieve so it can more easily be brushed out when dry.
5.6.5 If drying is done near a hot kiln, be careful that the temperature will not be high enough to melt the solder on the sieves.
5.6.6 Use the brush carefully on the finer sieves to avoid damaging them.
5.6.7 Watch carefully for rips in the sieves, especially around the edges. Repair with hot glue if necessary.
5.6.8 Watch the stacking order carefully to be sure the sieves are in order during washing.
6. Reference Documents
Test Definition Report,
Test Procedure Report,
Data Collection Fill-In Form Report.
7. Reason for Re-issue
Temp 1 Initial Draft
Temp 2 Spelling and Grammer check and minor revisions.
Temp 3 Adjustment in data collection process due to better data entry facilities in the software.
The stated particle size of a material and fired appearance can both be misleading. For example, these are Volclay 325 bentonite particles fired to cone 8 oxidation. They are from a water washed sieve analysis test, the oversize particles from a 325 mesh screen (left) make up 2% of the total and 1% are from the 200 mesh screen (right). Although the 325 particles appear ominously dark, individually they are likely to small to produce apparent fired specks in a porcelain. However 200 mesh sizes can produce visible fired specks, but that fraction of oversize does not have nearly as high iron or flux content. Still, the finer darker particles could agglomerate, it might be better to use a cleaner bentonite to plasticize a porcelain.
These are the oversize particles (from the 79, 100, 140 and 200 mesh sieves) from 100 grams of a commercial Gleason ball clay. They have been fired to cone 8 oxidation. There is 1.5 grams total, this is within the limits stated on their data sheet even though the material is sold as 200 mesh grade. Firing the samples shows whether the particles contain iron that will produce specking in porcelains and whiteware. In this case there are a few. We do this test on many materials and this is typical of what we see.
These are the oversize particles (from the 70, 100, 140 and 200 mesh sieves) from 100 grams of a commercial ball clay. They have been fired to cone 10 reduction. As you can see, this material is a potential cause of specking, especially in porcelain bodies. It is not only wise to check for oversize particles in clays, but firing these particles will tell you if they contain iron. A 200 mesh screen would be a good start for this test, it would catch all of these.
These particles are from a grog that has been milled and separated into its constituent sizes in the lab. As you can see it has a wide range of particle sizes, from 48 to finer than 200 mesh. When fired ceramic (like bricks) is ground the finer sizes often predominate. Because the coarser grades have a lower yield they can be much more expensive and harder to get. But they are the most effective in reducing the drying shrinkage and fired stability of structural and sculptural bodies.
Example of the oversize particles from a 100 gram wet sieve analysis test of a powdered sample of a porcelain body made from North American refined materials. Although these materials are sold as 200 mesh, that designation does not mean that there are no particles coarser than 200 mesh. Here there are significant numbers of particles on the 100 and even 70 mesh screens. These contain some darker particles that could produce fired specks (if they are iron and not lignite); that goodness in this case they do not. Oversize particle is a fact of life in bodies made from refined materials and used by potters and hobbyists. Industrial manufacturers (e.g. tile, tableware, sanitaryware) commonly process the materials further, slurrying them and screening or ball milling; this is done to guarantee defect-free glazed surfaces.
To measure particle size in a slurry or powder you need sieves. This is the most popular type used in labs. They are made from brass by a company named Tyler. The range of screen sizes for testing particle size is very wide (obvious here: the top screen has an opening of 56 mm, the bottom one 0.1 mm - the wires are almost too small to see). You can buy these on ebay for a lot less than new ones, search for "tyler sieve". The finer sieves (especially 200) are fragile and easily ripped. It is good to have a 50, 100 and 150.
The coarsest screen is at the top, the finest on the bottom. The opening for each is shown on the label. They are chosen such that each successive screen going down has an opening that is about half the area of the one above it. Using this series you can produce a practical measurement of the distribution of particle sizes in ceramic materials and bodies used in traditional ceramics (structural products industries, like brick, measure coarser particles than this, starting at perhaps 10 mesh and ending at 70). The 325 screen on the bottom is only used sometimes, it is difficult to finer-that-325 particles to pass through it because it blinds. It is not possible to shake powder through sieves that are this fine, samples must be washed through. We use the SIEV test to log results.
Some simple equipment is all you need. You can do practical tests to characterize a clay in your own studio or workshop. You need a gram scale (accurate to 0.01g) and set of calipers (check Amazon.com). Some metal sieves (search "Tyler Sieves" on Ebay). A stamp to mark samples with code and specimen numbers. A plaster table or slab. A propeller mixer. And, of course, a test kiln. And you need a place to put, and learn from, all the measurement data collected. An account at insight-live.com is perfect.
Particles from each category in a particle size distribution test of Skagit Fireclay
The Physics of Clay Bodies
Learn to test your clay bodies and recording the results in an organized way and understanding the purpose of each test and how to relate its results to changes that need to be made in process and recipe.
How to Find and Test Your Own Native Clays
Some of the key tests needed to really understand what a clay is and what it can be used for can be done with inexpensive equipment and simple procedures. These practical tests can give you a better picture than a data sheet full of numbers.
Particle Size Distribution
Knowing the distribution of particle sizes in a ceramic material is often very important in assessing its function and suitability for an application.
Sieves are important in ceramics for removing particulates and agglomerates from glaze, engobe and body slurries.
It Starts With a Lump of Clay: How to Assess a Native Clay
Tyler and US sieve mesh and conversion information at Wikipedia
|Tests||% Passing 325 Mesh Wet|
|Tests||Ultimate Particle Size Distribution|
|Tests||Sieve Analysis Dry|
|Tests||Sieve Analysis Wet|
|Tests||Average Particle Size (Microns)|
Tests conducted to determine particle populations, sizes, shapes, densities, surface areas, etc.
Tests conducted on bodies made from materials, as opposed to the materials themselves.