The process we used to improve the 20x5 base cone 6 glaze recipe
I love to use the Glaze Dragon as a symbol of the attitudes that prevent us from getting control of our glazes. It is a good analogy for the prevailing 'glaze recipe culture' and our addiction to the 'roulette wheel' approach to finding glazes. The dragon wants us to think glaze science is a 'mystery', that existing recipes were dropped from heaven and questioning or adjusting them is blasphemy. The advent of the internet has actually made us worse, we're furiously trafficking in more recipes that don't travel well.
Decades of glossy magazines have taught us that 'appearance is everything'. Schools still crank out generations of ceramists with numbed consciences regarding their functional accountability to customers. At conferences we've argued about craft and art and addressed the politics of ceramics. But the closest we ever seem to come to understanding glazes is learning application methods. It is true, many authors and teachers have been singing the 'learn-your-materials' song. But those studying materials feel ill-equipped to create balanced, fitted, strong, color compatible glazes, opening the kiln is still like pulling the handle on a slot machine.
The key to creating good recipes is the marriage of material and oxide knowledge. Oxides? Fired glazes are built out of them. They are a universal language of glazes. The kiln decomposes ceramic materials into their oxide building blocks and reassembles them into the fired glaze. Oxide know-how has been out there all along and computer users have rediscovered it. These people have not been on the roller coaster, they have been making really exciting things happen in the studio and on the factory floor, learning from their mistakes as never before. And the Internet has allowed them to find each other and rejoice in not being as alone as they thought.
But many questions still remain. The most asked question I hear is: "Do you have a good cone 6 glaze?" It is asked so often because so many non-satisfactory answers have been given in the past. What we need to answer it well is a 'attitude transplant' about what a good glaze is and how to get it. I would like to demonstrate how we can view materials as both powders with a physical presence that shapes the properties of the glaze slurry and also as 'oxide warehouses' that supply building blocks to the fired glass.
After enough failed 'affairs' with textbook or internet recipes you can lose your ability to recognize true glaze quality. It is much more than simple visual character. A good recipe is:
How many textbook glazes have you found that could withstand this scrutiny? I've had ones that looked good but satisfied almost none of these requirements! Remember a fundamental point: The key to creating good recipes is the marriage of material and oxide knowledge. It would be very difficult indeed to meet the above requirements using a material-blending approach. It would be impossible to chance upon them by mixing recipes! It is imperative to look at the fired glaze as a formula. What is a formula? A formula compares the numbers of oxide molecules in the fired glaze. Oxides tend to have predictable effects.
You might respond: "That's too much trouble, it is all a matter of faith and trust anyway, just give me the glaze recipe!" But the Potter's Prayer is not enough, ethics and accountability are involved. Other's materials are different than mine, as is their clay, process, firing, taste, and type of ware. Someone's poor implementation or misapplication of my recipe could produce weak, difficult-to-clean, crazed, shivered, leached ware that hurts the reputation of the ceramic community, could injure people physically, and makes me partly accountable for the technical quality of their ware! Ethically I should understand and document a recipe before handing it out to prove that I am conscientious and willing to field questions to help users adapt. Borrowing recipes from others without being willing to adjust or question them is looking more and more like taking someone else's prescription.
Let's try to create and test glaze recipe that addresses the above requirements. I'll leave the trial and error additions of colorants, opacifiers, specking agents and variegators to you. First, consider this limit chart for cone 6 non-leaded stoneware glazes.
Cone 6 Limits: Green & Cooper
|Boron unified with other fluxes|
This chart is not a boundary waiting to be proven invalid, it is simply a recommendation of the ceramic industry. Formulas within these ranges present the least problems and tend to test well for leaching and hardness.
Now lets talk about the oxides in the above limit chart. As we do so don't think about the powdered materials you use to mix up the glaze batch, imagine being able to look at the fired glaze under a microscope powerful enough to reveal the oxide structure. I will consider them in the order they can most easily be supplied from parent materials.
Boron is a low melting glass, it is like silica on steroids, it is a flux and a glass. It is possible to make a cone 6 glaze without boron but it won't flow nearly as well and it will tend craze. Lots of cone 6 glazes have way too much boron, some employing Gerstley Borate to supply as much B2O3 as all the other fluxes combined. Not good, it should be one third of that. Why? Durability, solubility and reversal of the thermal expansion influence. Like steroids, use it when appropriate and in the right amounts only! I get very good melt fluidity when B2O3 comprises about 25% of the fluxes. However chrome-tin colors tend to start failing if the boron is more than one third of the CaO amount, more on this later.
A no-alumina boron frit is perfect to source B2O3 because we can supply lots of alumina from kaolin, giving the glaze good slurry properties. About 25% Frit 3134 will give us the needed boron. How do I know that? A ceramic calculation program will show you the makeup of the frit, let you select which oxide to supply and specify how much. It then calculates the amount of frit needed.
CaO is a strong flux at cone 10 but not as much so at cone 6. But having some B2O3 around can really encourage CaO to flow better. Likewise the presence of sodium and potassium can turn CaO into a much more active flux (melter). We need CaO as high as possible to make the glaze work with chrome-tin colors, so I would like to approach the maximum recommended in the limit formula. However CaO can really tend to form either calcium-silicate or calcium-borate crystals on cooling if oversupplied. This is a bit of a dilemma.
To get around 0.55 formula units of CaO (of a total of 1.0) we need to top up the CaO already supplied by the frit. This will take 10% of my favorite calcium mineral, Wollastonite. It is much better quality than whiting, contains finely dispersed SiO2, and it does not form gases of decomposition.
As noted above, these oxides are a good choice to round out the fluxes to a total of 1 (unity formulas are adjusted so the fluxes total 1). Na2O and K2O behave in a similar manner and melt well at cone 6 to encourage bright colors. I chose to use a clean and consistent feldspar named Kona F-4, 15% is needed. The feldspar also brings some alumina and silica with it.
An interesting part of supplying this on the computer is that the feldspar also sources CaO so you have to go back and adjust the Wollastonite again to restore CaO to 0.6.
Al2O3 gives the glaze melt body, stiffens it to keep it from running off the ware, even over a range of temperatures. The stiff melt also prevents the growth of crystals that disrupt smooth glaze surfaces and cloud transparents, we want that in a base glaze. Alumina lowers glaze thermal expansion very significantly and is a key to glaze hardness and resistance to leaching. Alumina and boron melt together very well. Like SiO2, you want as much alumina as a glaze will take and still melt well (you need good reason to under supply Al2O3 i.e. non-functional crystalline glazes). High Al2O3 usually means a matte glaze, but not if there is significant B2O3 and SiO2 glass formers around.
Boron glazes can take a lot of Al2O3, the above chart claims 0.65 parts (compared to around 0.4 for non-boron glazes). Tests I have done show that with the above amount of boron a glaze in this system will comfortably take 0.35 alumina, melt very well and prevent crystal growth. By 'melts well' I mean it has fired hardness, minimal bubble population, smooth hard surface, and good melt flow.
Kaolin supplies Al2O3 and it produces a glaze slurry that gels, applies evenly to ware, and dries hard. This is a match made in heaven, the more kaolin a we can employ the better. What kind of kaolin? I prefer EP Kaolin because it is clean, plastic, and flocculates and gels the glaze so it applies without drips, even on dense bisque ware.
Like alumina, silica has many beneficial effects on the fired glass. It reduces thermal expansion and increases glaze hardness; the more a glaze can tolerate the better, the limit formula above recommends up to 4.7. It is true that too much will compromise matteness or raise the melting temperature, but it is surprising how many glazes will take plenty of silica without any trouble. For example, I ran many tests with around 2.5 parts SiO2 thinking that it would not melt well with more. Then I added a full 10% silica (the equivalent for going from 2.5 formula to 3.0) and it worked perfectly, completely solving a crazing problem on a low silica porcelain I use. It is possible this recipe will tolerate even more.
Classic ceramic calculations that have been around since early this century but we just never bothered. Now glaze chemistry software makes it easy to do them and we are figuring out new ways to apply them. Shown here is an example of the 'business end' of a ceramic calculation computer program.
After supplying each of the above oxides from the indicated materials I juggled material amounts to achieve 5% roundoffs. This held all the oxide amounts fairly close to target (except that CaO is a little over the target).
Here is the recipe:
|G1214W CLEAR LOW EXPANSION|
Below there is link to this recipe in the recipe area of this site.
Now please remember, I am not promoting this recipe as the end-all of cone 6 functional base glazes. This one is part of a larger project centered on the G1214M recipe. I am promoting a way of thinking. Take this recipe, understand it, adjust it, make it work for you. For example:
By the way, I found that this recipe worked well with equal parts by weight of water and powder to give a specific gravity of 1.45.
Mention the idea of testing a glaze and 99% of us think in terms of dipping a test tile and firing it to see how it looks. But testing should consider far more. You should test slurry properties, application properties, devitrification, clarity, crawling, stain compatibility, leaching, hardness, cutlery marking, crazing/shivering, reaction with solubles, melt flow, firing volatility, and for general functional use.
It is true, oxides and formulas can seem intimidating at first. But consider: I can list the oxides on the fingers of my hands and they have predictable behavior. Compare this with thousands of materials whose effects in recipes are much more difficult to predict (there is no such things a 'material limit recipes'). Perhaps you wonder where a person might learn about this 'predictable behavior' of oxides. It does tend to be pretty sparse in textbooks. The oxides area of this site is an excellent place to start.
It is possible that you need to move still further to stop crazing on your clay body, especially if it is very low in silica. We suggest increasing B2O3 slightly and then increasing Al2O3. Or you may simply be able to add silica. In serious cases of crazing the magic oxide is MgO, increasing at at the expense of K2O and Na2O will dramatically reduce the expansion. MgO does not melt as well at middle temperature but we have found the diversifying the fluxes and increasing the boron a little will make room for as much MgO as you need. Here is our G1215M recipe. Although the materials in the recipe are quite different, the chemistry is very similar. The small amount of zinc should not be a problem for most, but if it is you can leave it out and see if it still melts enough, if not add a little more frit. You can try increasing the kaolin further to drop expansion. Note that this recipe does not total 100.
As of Dec 2002 we have released a new low expansion base glaze numbered G1215U. It turns out that substituting MgO for other fluxes is by far the most effective way to reduce glaze thermal expansion. Fusion frit F69 or Ferro 3249 are the magic behind this type of approach (Frit 3249 contains a little CaO in addition to the MgO). These high magnesia frits melt much better than any natural MgO source and they do not produce gases during decomposition. Here is the recipes we are working with now:
or using Frit F69:
Because of high MgO this glaze is hostile to the development of color in Chrome Tin pink stains. It thus makes sense to add 1-2 percent zinc to make it work better with oranges and browns. We have tried it with about 20 other Mason stain and it works well with all of them (including manganese alumina pink, lavender and yellows).
This formula does not work well with chrome tin pink colors. To make it work you must reduce the boron and increase the calcia until it does. For the brightest pinks you may have to tolerate an increase in thermal expansion and another clay body higher in silica may have to be used to prevent crazing.
Since Frit 3134 and equivalents soften very early it is important that as much of the gases of decomposition from the body are expelled as possible before the frit melts and flows too much. If you get pinholing or blistering, try slowing the firing down during the phase just before the frit begins to melt. In this case it is around 1300-1400F.
Yes, we have a very good matte version that can be tuned to fire with a surface very close to the classic dolomite magnesia mattes of cone 10 reduction (see links).
If you feel this was all too complicated, take heart. All of us are in over our heads, the ceramic process is exceptionally complex and none of us are really in control. So we need tools to better understand it. The oxide viewpoint provides a solid framework within which we can grow and learn together, even criticize each other. Yes this framework gives you the opportunity to explain how I am totally wrong about something in the above analysis. Then this base glaze would get even better. So let's at least start the new journey.
This demonstrates how the host glaze affects the color development of certain stains. Blue is stable in pretty well all glazes. But chrome tin pink (top row) is very particular that the glaze have the right chemistry (1214M is obviously best, it has the highest CaO and lowest B2O3). The 6100 brown works much better in the N and O base glazes (they have higher Al2O3). Stain companies have guidance on chemistry particulars and you can view the chemistry of your recipe in your account at insight-live.com.
There are many mindsets that prevent us to getting control of our glazes. Many of them have nothing to do with the glazes themselves, the problem is with us, our culture as ceramists and potters.
Insight installs on your Linux, Windows or Mac computer. It provides a very interactive way to comparing two recipes and their calculated formulas or analyses. As you make changes in the recipe you can see how it impacts the recipes. It is ideal for demonstrating concepts like unity, analysis, formula, mole%, LOI, formula-to-batch conversion.
Out Bound Links
MgO is the secret weapon of craze control. If your application can tolerate it you can create a cone 6 base glaze of very low thermal expansion that is very resistant to crazing.
A recipe developed by Tony Hansen in the 1980s. Its was popular because of the simplicity of the recipe and how well it worked with chrome-tin stains.
2003-12-17 - This is also known as the 20x5 recipe. It was developed during the early 1980s to demonstrate principles of glaze chemistry in creating a glaze base s...
A cone 6 base clear glaze recipe developed by deriving a recipe from a formula taken as an average of limit formulas
2003-06-21 - More information is available in the articles section at the Digitalfire Reference Database.
This glaze was born as a demonstration of how to use chemistry to convert a glossy cone 6 glaze into a matte.
2003-06-10 - Please click the article link below for more information. This recipe is adjustable in that you can raise and lower the silica to increase and decr...
A recipe sourcing high MgO (from Ferro Frit 3249) to produce a low expansion glass resistant to crazing on lower silica porcelains.
2003-12-18 - The original impetus to create this recipe was to reduce the thermal expansion of the G1214M and G1215W recipes to work better on porcelains (the othe...
There is more to glazes than their visual character, they have other physical properties like hardness, thermal expansion, leachability, chemistry and they exhibit many defects. Here are some simple tests.
In Bound Links
This is a base transparent glaze recipe developed for cone 6. It is known as the 20x5 or 20 by 5 recipe. It is a simple 5 material at 20% each mix and it makes a good home base from which to rationalize adjustments.
The only way you will ever get the glaze you really need is to formulate your own. The longer you stay on the glaze recipe treadmill the more time you waste.
This glaze was developed using the 1214W glossy as a starting point. This article overviews the types of matte glazes and rationalizes the method used to make this one.
Recipes here are for demo purposes. Read the explanatory information about how to adjust, how it was formulated, links to similar ones, links to ones earlier or later in the series. There ar...
By Tony Hansen